Click here to register.

Spanish

Flat
Julius and CMUSphinx performance
User: aleixroca
Date: 6/12/2013 11:07 am
Views: 3527
Rating: 7

Hi all!

I'm starting to work on this wonderful world of speech recognition, and more specifically, Spanish speech recognition.

I have started building my own project using CMUSphinx libraries and I have already developed a little spanish speech recongition project using the CMUSphinx acoustic model and dictionary.

I was now wondering whether I could reach better performance using Julius instead of CMUSphinx. And this is the reason why I'm writing this down.

My application just needs some words (10 or less) to work, but needs to be speaker independent.

The first difference I noticed is that CMUSphinx provides their own already build acoustic model, but with julius I need to build my own and it seems to need a lot of work. Do you think is worth the effort of building the model? I have read that the algorithm which internally uses both CMUSphinx and Julius are the same so I would need your advice.

Thank you very much! :-)

Re: Julius and CMUSphinx performance
User: Kritik
Date: 9/25/2014 8:29 am
Views: 104
Rating: 6

Im trying to bould my first speech recognition program, but i dont know how to use sphinx libraries in my java proyect.


Could i see your code? is it easy to understand?

 

Thank you.

Re: Julius and CMUSphinx performance
User: nsh
Date: 9/25/2014 9:13 am
Views: 883
Rating: 5

> Im trying to bould my first speech recognition program, but i dont know how to use sphinx libraries in my java proyect.

Well, you are welcome to ask. You can find a tutorial describing basic thigns here:
http://cmusphinx.sourceforge.net/wiki/tutorialsphinx4
You can download the code here:
http://github.com/cmusphinx/sphinx4

> Could i see your code?

 

The example is here:

 

https://github.com/cmusphinx/sphinx4/blob/master/sphinx4-samples/src/main/java/edu/cmu/sphinx/demo/transcriber/TranscriberDemo.java

> is it easy to understand?

You are welcome to ask the questions
PreviousNext